Current editionIndependent · Evidence led · Published in AustraliaReader market · Wildlife & biosecurity

The weekly paper
for curious people

See the connections.
Understand the consequences.

Free email via Substack →

Swipe to see more sections →

Wildlife & biosecurity

One virus.
Four different questions.

A low present risk to most people does not establish a low risk to native wildlife. Wild-bird detections do not establish a poultry outbreak.

Lens keeps each consequence attached to the evidence capable of supporting it.

01

People

What is the current public-health assessment?

02

Wildlife

What harm is possible, and what remains unknown?

03

Poultry

Has the virus entered agricultural production?

04

Preparedness

What plans, doses and practical constraints exist?

The count

231

tested detections—not every infected bird in Australia.

The national record can establish confirmed or presumed positive detections. It cannot establish the number of living wild birds carrying the virus.

The practical question

How do you vaccinate 5,000 wild penguins?

Meet them on their normal route, guide them into a small pen, briefly hold each bird for an injection and microchip, release it, then find it again three to four weeks later.

The plan needs 10,000 doses. The records used by Lens did not establish that the full supply had been secured.

Complete free investigation

Inspect the answer, the different views and the records yourself.

Read the bird-flu Lens →

Lens is free

Follow the story when the evidence changes.

Every story stays free. Subscribe and we will email you when a new issue is ready.

No paywall

No card. Unsubscribe anytime.

Subscribe free →